More Human, Not Less: How AI Helps Authors Actually Show Up
When life tried to pull me away from my readers, AI brought me back
Here’s something I hear all the time: “AI makes authors less human.”
Less authentic. Less real. Less us.
I understand why people feel that way. When you picture AI and writing in the same sentence, it’s easy to imagine some faceless content mill churning out soulless words. I get the fear. But I want to tell you what actually happened to me last year, because it’s the opposite of that story.
Last year, AI was the only reason my readers heard from me at all.
The Year Everything Was Too Much
I was burned out. Thoroughly, down-to-the-bones burned out.
Between my work as CTO of Future Fiction Academy and everything happening at Future Fiction Press, I had nothing left in the tank for the “extra” stuff. And by extra, I mean all the things that keep an author connected to their audience — blog posts, behind-the-scenes content, promotion, the little touches that remind readers you’re a real person who wrote that book they loved.
That’s the stuff that goes first when you’re running on fumes. You tell yourself you’ll get to it next week. Next month. After this deadline. And then months pass and your readers haven’t heard from you, and the silence grows, and you start to feel like a ghost haunting your own career.
I’ve been in this industry for over twelve years. I know what silence does. It doesn’t make you seem like a mysterious artist. It makes people forget you exist.
What AI Actually Did for Me
I had a book in an anthology, and I needed to promote it. In a normal year, I would have sat down and brainstormed blog post ideas, outlined them, drafted them, revised them — the whole process. But I didn’t have that kind of energy. I barely had the energy to open my laptop some days.
So I turned to AI.
I fed it the book. Not to rewrite it, not to create some synthetic marketing copy — but to help me think about my own work. What themes did this story explore? What would readers find interesting about the world-building? What questions might someone ask after reading it? What angles could I use to write blog posts that would genuinely connect with people?
AI helped me process my own creative work and pull out ideas I was too exhausted to see on my own. It didn’t replace my voice. It helped me find it again when I’d temporarily lost it under a pile of burnout and obligations.
The result? A series of blog posts that went out to my audience during the anthology’s run. Content that was me — my ideas, my perspective, my knowledge of the story — just organized and structured with some help.
Without AI, my readers would have gotten nothing. Radio silence. Another author who disappeared for a year.
The Part That Matters Most
Those blog posts are still getting clicks. Every day, readers are finding them through my newsletter. New readers are discovering me through search engines because the content is rich and specific and genuinely useful.
Let me say that again: content I could only create because AI helped me through a brutal year is still bringing readers to my work months later.
That’s not dehumanizing. That’s the most human thing I could have done — showing up for my audience even when showing up felt impossible.
Visibility Is Humanity
What I think people get wrong about the “AI makes us less human” argument is that they’re focused on the production of words. But readers don’t experience your production process.
They experience your presence.
Every blog post you write is a handshake with a reader. Every newsletter is a reminder that there’s a real person behind those books they love. Every piece of content you put out — whether it’s a craft breakdown, a character deep-dive, a behind-the-scenes look at your process — is you saying, “Hey, I’m here. I’m still creating. I’m still thinking about this story and this world and you.”
AI lets you extend more of those handshakes. Not fake ones — real ones, built on your actual ideas and your actual work. You’re just getting help with the logistics of turning those ideas into finished content.
And the alternative? The alternative isn’t some pure, hand-crafted artisanal experience for your readers. The alternative is silence. The alternative is your audience forgetting you exist because you’re too overwhelmed to show up.
Which one sounds more human to you?
AI as a Thinking Partner
One of the things that surprised me most about using AI for those blog posts was how it changed my relationship with my own work.
When you feed a book into AI and ask it to help you think about themes and angles, you end up engaging with your writing from perspectives you might never have considered on your own. It’s like having a conversation with a really thoughtful reader who asks good questions. “What about this thread? Have you considered this angle? Your readers might be interested in this aspect of the world-building.”
That’s not outsourcing your creativity. That’s deepening it. You’re reflecting on your own work, finding new layers, discovering things you put into the story without even realizing it. And then you’re sharing those discoveries with your audience.
If anything, AI helped me be more thoughtful about my own writing, not less.
The Real Dehumanizing Force
You know what actually dehumanizes authors? The expectation that we do everything ourselves, from scratch, all the time.
Write the book. Edit the book. Format the book. Design the cover (or manage someone who does). Write the blurb. Set up the ads. Manage the keywords. Write the newsletter. Create the social media posts. Engage with readers. Plan the next book. Attend to your business. Handle the accounting. Keep up with industry changes. And do it all while maintaining a day job, or raising kids, or dealing with health issues, or grieving, or just living a human life.
That’s what’s dehumanizing. That relentless grind with no support and no breathing room — that’s what makes authors burn out and disappear. That’s what makes us go silent on our audiences. That’s what makes us feel like machines, ironically enough.
AI gives you breathing room. It takes some of the cognitive load off the pile so you can actually be a person again — both to your audience and to yourself. Nobody shames a chef for using a food processor. The meal still requires taste and judgment and creativity. The tool just makes it possible to serve dinner before midnight.
More of You, Not Less
Here’s what I want you to sit with:
AI doesn’t replace your humanity. It amplifies it.
Your ideas are still yours. Your opinions are still yours. Your lived experience, your taste, your creative vision — none of that gets outsourced when you use a tool to help you organize your thoughts or structure a blog post or brainstorm angles on your own work.
What changes is your capacity. You can share more of yourself with your audience. You can show up more often. You can take the ideas that are rattling around in your head — the ones you never had time to turn into content — and actually get them out into the world where readers can find them.
More content means more connection points. More connection points means more readers who know you’re a real person with real thoughts and real passion for your work. And that — not the suffering, not the hand-wringing about “purity” — is what builds a lasting relationship between an author and an audience.
The Invitation
So here’s my question for you:
What would you put in front of your readers if the bottleneck wasn’t your energy?
What blog or social media posts would you write? What behind-the-scenes content would you share? What aspects of your creative work would you love to explore and present to your audience, if only you had the bandwidth?
Because the tools exist right now to help you do that. Not by replacing your voice, but by helping your voice travel further.
Last year, AI didn’t make me less human to my readers. It made me more present. More visible. More connected. It kept me in the conversation when burnout was trying to pull me out of it entirely.
And my readers? They’re still clicking. Still reading. Still showing up.
Because I showed up first — with a little help.
How do you show up for your readers when life gets overwhelming? Have AI tools helped you stay connected with your audience? I’d love to hear your stories in the comments.



This is exactly what I did, months ago. I fed it my full manuscript, and it threw out brilliant ideas about themes I had not fully realized (the depth) in my work. Now, I have 365 days' worth of facebook post ideas and 52 weeks' worth of substack post ideas. It's still a ton of work, and I may not be as thorough with my next book (probably will not), but it has been, and is continuing to be, educational and interesting for me.
I think I'd argue that this could go either way. I just read your article top to bottom, and I have no idea whether you used an AI to help you write it or not. In my eyes, that's a VERY positive thing. I've seen well over two million words of AI text at this point (might be over three million, come to think of it), between editing gigs, books I've read on Kindle, online articles, and so on. I generally consider myself pretty good at spotting unaltered AI output most of the time.
Although it's getting tougher. Someone did a flash fiction test last autumn, and I only got 3/4 correct. ;)
Anyway, my point is I read these articles because they clearly convey your voice. Whatever process you're using, I can still hear Steph coming through in those words. I enjoy getting *your* take on things. I like reading *your* thoughts on a topic. It's always interesting and enlightening.
On the flip side, I've seen a few other Substacks where the posts are generally just raw AI, or very close to raw AI. The person has clearly asked a chatbot "write me a blog post about X, hitting these three major topics," and then just posted the results. These essays tend to be bland, boring, and hit only the surface of a topic. It's like reading the Google search summary on something - they're not really deep-diving into the nuances or personal feelings about a topic.
If I wanted the answer to "does AI make writers more or less human in their output," I could just ask the AI myself.
If I wanted to see "what does Steph Pajonas, one of the world's leading experts on the intersection of AI and publishing, think about the human side of writing with AI?" Well, there's only two ways I can get that info. I can call her and ask, or I can read her blog post on the topic. ;) Because the blog post was carefully constructed in a manner that rings of voice, personal experience, and individual feelings, it's interesting and valuable.
But if the post was the raw AI answer that anyone could get just by asking ChatGPT, that's neither. And therein lies the key, in my experience.
Our voices are why readers follow us. Learning to produce work that resounds with our experiences, feelings, ideals, and emotions is how we build fans and followers, regardless what tools are being used to write the work.